|
In the past four years alone, the number of phone-tap
warrants approved by the courts and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has
tripled from 675 to 2157 - one-third more than all state and federal taps
approved in the US. In contrast to the US, our national security authorities,
including the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation, do not
publish statistics of their bugs. The extent of the tapping has prompted federal Labor
justice spokesman Daryl Melham to call for a new body to oversee the use of
phone taps by Australian police, possibly based on a model used in Britain ,
which has a chief surveillance commissioner. "There is an urgent need to strengthen the resources
available for external scrutiny of telephone interception activities and
other forms of intrusive surveillance," Mr Melham said. Labor analysis shows that only seven of the 2164 police
applications for interception warrants were rejected by the courts last year.
Since 1999, when Administrative Appeals Tribunal officers were first given
power to issue warrants, numbers have increased sharply. AAT officers now issue 94 per cent of all warrants, Family
Court judges 5 per cent, and Supreme Court judges only 1 per cent. The Australian Council of Civil Liberties said the
explosion in warrants showed that police were forum shopping and targeting
sympathetic judicial officers. Cameron Murphy, secretary of the council, demanded the
federal Government publish more detailed information to reveal if a handful
of judges and officials were responsible for most of the warrants. "We think Australians would be aghast if they knew so
many people's phone conversations were being bugged," Mr Murphy said. Labor also warned that Australian police were achieving
far fewer criminal convictions per phone tap than US authorities. Between 1996 and 2001, US police made 3.31 arrests and
secured 1.55 convictions for each phone tap. Over the same period Australian agencies made only 0.63
arrests per phone tap and 0.46 convictions. A spokesman for Mr Melham said technological advances were
part of the reason for the explosion in tapping. All telecommunications providers were now required to
construct their facilities so that police could tap phones centrally instead
of climbing telegraph poles. This report appears on news.com.au. |
|
|
|
|